Jan Choinski vs Zsombor Piros Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the recent statistics of Dominic Piros and Jan Choinski paints a detailed picture of what one might expect in their upcoming tennis clash. Over the past six months, second serve performance shows a closely matched contest, with Choinski winning 44.49% of his points on this serve compared to Piros's 44.34%. This metric serves as a fundamental indicator for precise match predictions.

In terms of return game statistics, Piros shows a slight edge, having won 45.09% of points on his opponent's second serve, whereas Choinski has managed 42.63%. A similar trend is observed in first serve returns, where Piros boasts a 28.45% success rate compared to Choinski's 24.6%. These serve and return stats are crucial in predicting the likely favorite in this head-to-head meeting.

The breakdown of recent form under pressure highlights Choinski's ability to save 55.76% of breakpoints, compared to Piros's 49.8%, which can be pivotal for in-game betting analyses. An overall performance summary from the last year shows Choinski winning 50.85% of his matches (W/L 30/29) against Piros's more commendable 54.1% (W/L 33/28), underscoring his slight upper hand.

Surface preferences further delineate potential advantages, with both players favoring clay. Piros has edged a better career win percentage of 65% on clay (W/L 180/95), whereas Choinski stands at 63% (W/L 217/130). However, while Choinski struggles most on grass (17% win rate), Piros has his worst performance on hard courts (52% win rate).

Player match participation over the last year shows both athletes primarily competing in Challenger and ITF tournaments over $10K, but Piros has demonstrated superior form with a 58.82% win rate (W/L 30/21) compared to Choinski's 55.32% (W/L 26/21). Average opponent rankings reveal Choinski competing against slightly higher-ranked players (average rank 235.73) than Piros does (average rank 278.62).

In high-pressure scenarios such as deciding sets, Piros has a slender advantage, having won 47% of such encounters over the past year compared to Choinski's 44%. In situations involving break-point opportunities, Choinski converts 37.04%, slightly ahead of Piros who converts 33.77%, a crucial metric for those interested in live betting.

Given the amalgamation of these statistics, Piros appears slightly favored to win based on his overall match-winning percentage, superior breakpoint retention under pressure, and a slight edge in return games. However, the match could swing either way with both displaying fairly matched stats in several key areas.